The State of Hinduism in 2000 A.D.—Some Emerging Trends
The State of Hinduism in 2000 A.D.—Some Emerging Trends is an essay by A. M. A. Ayrookuzhiel, first published in the Indian Journal of Theology, Vol. 26, No. 2 (April–June 1977). Drawing upon field observations and studies of popular religious beliefs, the essay examines how scientific knowledge, secularisation, social change, and modern values were reshaping religious attitudes in India. The essay approaches religion primarily as a social phenomenon and focuses on patterns of belief among ordinary people rather than formal theological doctrines. Ayrookuzhiel argues that Hinduism would continue as a major religious option in the future, but not without significant changes in the ways people understood gods, rituals, spirits, nature, and religious authority.
Contents
- Overview
- The triple loss
- Religious and secular responses
- The future of belief
- Changing concepts of God
- The God of play and the God of history
- Spirits, rituals, and religious practice
- Nature and the sacred cow
- Conclusion
- Full text
- Publication
Overview
The essay explores how ordinary people understand religion in an age increasingly influenced by science, education, technology, and modern social values. Rather than focusing on formal theology or philosophical Hinduism, Ayrookuzhiel examines popular religious attitudes found in everyday life.
Using examples drawn from village and urban settings, he argues that many traditional religious explanations of illness, misfortune, natural events, and social experience were gradually being replaced by secular and scientific interpretations. At the same time, he contends that religion itself was unlikely to disappear. Instead, religious belief would adapt to new intellectual and social conditions.
The triple loss
A central concept in the essay is what Ayrookuzhiel describes as a “triple loss”. As scientific explanations become more widely accepted, people increasingly move away from older religious interpretations of the world.
According to the essay, this process involves the gradual loss of a sense of mystery, a reduced sense of dependence upon supernatural powers, and the disappearance of sacred religious vocabulary from everyday speech. Traditional explanations for disease, natural events, and personal misfortune increasingly give way to medical, scientific, and secular explanations.
Ayrookuzhiel sees this transformation as one of the most important forces shaping the future of religion in modern India.
Religious and secular responses
The essay distinguishes between two broad responses to this changing environment.
The first is the religious response, which continues to interpret human life through the idea of a higher power or sakti. Even when traditional beliefs are challenged by scientific knowledge, believers continue to seek meaning in suffering, illness, death, and human limitations. Religious language may change, but the underlying search for meaning remains.
The second is the secular response. Those who adopt this view tend to regard nature, disease, and death as natural phenomena rather than expressions of divine will. Human effort, reason, science, and social cooperation become the primary means through which people understand and address the problems of life.
Ayrookuzhiel argues that both approaches would continue to exist side by side.
The future of belief
While predicting continuing secularisation, the essay does not foresee the disappearance of religion. Instead, Ayrookuzhiel suggests that many traditional supernatural explanations would gradually lose their influence.
Particular attention is given to local deities and supernatural agencies that historically explained disease, misfortune, and unexplained events. As scientific explanations become more widely accepted, such figures would increasingly lose their explanatory role.
Religion, however, would continue to provide frameworks of meaning through which people interpret suffering, death, uncertainty, and the broader purpose of human life.
Changing concepts of God
A major theme of the essay is that religious concepts evolve in response to social change.
Ayrookuzhiel argues that ideas about God are often reshaped to support the values held by believers in a particular historical period. He illustrates this through examples involving caste, social equality, and changing attitudes towards widows and marginalised groups.
According to the essay, modern democratic values increasingly influence the way religious people understand divine authority and moral responsibility. Rather than remaining fixed, religious concepts are continually reinterpreted in order to remain meaningful within changing social circumstances.
The God of play and the God of history
One of the most distinctive discussions in the essay concerns two different ways of understanding the divine.
Ayrookuzhiel contrasts a view in which worldly existence is regarded as part of a cosmic play with another in which human struggles for justice, righteousness, and compassion possess lasting significance. He refers to these perspectives as the “God of play” and the “God of history”.
The essay suggests that modern social concerns may encourage greater emphasis on historical action, ethical responsibility, and service to others, while still preserving the attraction of older traditions of detachment and inner peace.
Spirits, rituals, and religious practice
Ayrookuzhiel predicts a decline in belief in evil spirits and other supernatural beings that once occupied an important place in popular religion. Increased education, population growth, and modern infrastructure are presented as factors contributing to this change.
The essay also points to a decline in the observance of many domestic rituals and household religious practices. Although pilgrimage and temple visits remain popular, Ayrookuzhiel suggests that changing lifestyles and rational questioning may reduce the role of traditional ritual observance in everyday life.
Nevertheless, he does not interpret these developments as evidence of the disappearance of religion itself.
Nature and the sacred cow
The essay concludes its discussion of future trends by examining changing attitudes towards nature.
Ayrookuzhiel argues that modern society increasingly views nature in utilitarian terms. However, he also notes emerging awareness of the limits of unrestricted exploitation of the natural world.
Using the example of the cow, he raises the possibility that traditional religious symbols may acquire new meanings connected with environmental protection, stewardship, and respect for nature. The future significance of such symbols, he suggests, would depend upon the evolving relationship between religion, society, and the natural environment.
Conclusion
Ayrookuzhiel concludes that religion would remain a significant option for many people even within an increasingly secular society. The Hinduism of the future, however, would differ from earlier forms. It would contain fewer supernatural explanations, fewer traditional beliefs about spirits and divine intervention, and greater engagement with modern social values.
Rather than disappearing, religion would continue to adapt to changing historical conditions, reconstructing its concepts, symbols, and practices in response to new intellectual and social realities.
Full text
Publication
This essay first appeared in Indian Journal of Theology, Vol. 26, No. 2 (April–June 1977), pp. 86–91.
📄 This page was created on 9 June 2026. You can view its history on GitHub, preview the fileTip: Press Alt+Shift+G, or inspect the .