The Dalits, Religions and Interfaith Dialogue

The Dalits, Religions and Interfaith Dialogue is an essay by A. M. A. Ayrookuzhiel, first published in the Hindu-Christian Studies Bulletin, Vol. 7, 1994, pp. 13-19. The essay examines the relationship between Dalit liberation movements, Hinduism, other religious traditions, and interreligious dialogue in India. A. M. A. Ayrookuzhiel argues that Dalit struggles against caste oppression raise profound questions for all Indian religions, particularly regarding purity, pollution, ritual hierarchy, social exclusion, and the role of religion in sustaining caste-consciousness. The essay also explores anti-caste traditions among Dalit and lower-caste saints, presenting their teachings as important resources for justice-oriented interfaith dialogue and social renewal.

Contents

  1. Overview
  2. Dalit liberation and the critique of Hinduism
  3. Religious absorption and “Hindu imperialism”
  4. Dalits within Hinduism
  5. Dalits and other religions
  6. Interreligious dialogue and caste
  7. Teachings of Dalit and lower-caste saints
  8. Purity, ritualism, and anti-caste spirituality
  9. Concluding perspective
  10. Full text
  11. Publication

Overview

A. M. A. Ayrookuzhiel situates the essay within the emergence of Dalit political and cultural solidarity across religious boundaries in India. He argues that Dalits belonging to Hinduism, Christianity, Islam, Sikhism, Buddhism, and other traditions increasingly recognise themselves as members of a common oppressed social group facing similar forms of marginalisation.

The essay examines how Dalit liberation movements challenge the religious structures and cultural assumptions that historically legitimised caste hierarchy and untouchability. Ayrookuzhiel also argues that interreligious dialogue in India cannot remain confined to abstract theological exchange while ignoring caste oppression and social inequality.

Dalit liberation and the critique of Hinduism

The essay begins with a discussion of Dalit liberation literature and anti-caste writing. Ayrookuzhiel notes that many Dalit writers, poets, and activists directly challenge Hindu scriptures, caste ideology, and ritual concepts associated with purity and pollution.

Using examples from Dalit poetry and fiction, the essay describes how caste oppression is experienced not only socially and economically but also religiously. Ayrookuzhiel argues that Dalit literature frequently portrays Hindu religious traditions as structures that historically denied dignity and humanity to Dalits.

The essay also discusses the influence of Dr B.R. Ambedkar on Dalit political consciousness. Some Dalit movements, according to Ayrookuzhiel, advocate conversion to Buddhism and rejection of Hindu ritual structures, while others adopt more secular and rationalist approaches that view religion itself as an instrument of social domination.

Religious absorption and “Hindu imperialism”

A major theme of the essay is the historical incorporation of tribal and Dalit religious traditions into Brahmanical Hinduism. Ayrookuzhiel argues that many local gods, sacred groves, shrines, rituals, and community traditions were gradually absorbed into dominant Hindu religious structures over centuries.

The essay describes how tribal and regional deities became identified with major Hindu gods through mythological reinterpretation and ritual incorporation. Ayrookuzhiel refers to this process using terms such as “Hindu imperialism” and “Brahmin internal cultural colonialism”, arguing that many subordinated communities lost religious autonomy, control over sacred spaces, and independent cultural identities through these processes.

According to the essay, this religious incorporation paralleled wider political and economic subordination. Dalit and tribal groups often internalised Brahmanical myths and accepted demeaning ritual roles within village festivals, temple systems, and caste society.

Dalits within Hinduism

Ayrookuzhiel argues that many Dalits continue to identify as Hindus due to a combination of historical, political, social, and cultural factors. Government classifications, reservation policies, participation in Hindu festivals, attachment to Hinduised local deities, and the incorporation of Dalit shrines into larger temple structures all contributed to this situation.

The essay also examines the role of Hindu political and religious organisations in attempting to retain Dalits within the Hindu fold. Ayrookuzhiel notes that these organisations viewed the Dalit population as politically significant within the broader Hindu community.

At the same time, the essay highlights Ambedkar’s argument that Dalits cannot achieve genuine human dignity unless fundamental changes occur within Hindu theology, ritual structures, and priesthood.

Dalits and other religions

The essay discusses the historical movement of Dalits into religions such as Islam, Sikhism, Christianity, and Buddhism. Ayrookuzhiel argues that many conversions occurred in contexts where these religions offered political support, social mobility, or possibilities for dignity unavailable within caste Hindu society.

The essay also examines religious movements associated with lower-caste and untouchable saints including Ravidasis, Kabir Panthis, Dadu Panthis, Satnamis, and Valmikis. These traditions criticised caste hierarchy and promoted ideas of common humanity and spiritual equality.

However, Ayrookuzhiel argues that caste and class divisions continued to exist within many non-Hindu religious communities as well. Even where communities were predominantly Dalit, educational and leadership inequalities often prevented full alignment between religious leadership and Dalit social interests.

Interreligious dialogue and caste

One of the central concerns of the essay is the relationship between caste and interreligious dialogue in India. Ayrookuzhiel argues that many official forms of interfaith engagement ignored or minimised the reality of untouchability.

The essay cites examples from international interreligious conferences where references to untouchability were allegedly resisted or diluted by some Indian delegates. Ayrookuzhiel presents this as evidence that caste-consciousness affected even supposedly universal religious and dialogue platforms.

In contrast, the essay argues that meaningful interreligious dialogue should focus on liberation, humanisation, justice, equality, and social transformation. Ayrookuzhiel draws attention to thinkers such as Dr M.M. Thomas, who argued that dialogue between religions should engage directly with questions of oppression and human dignity.

Teachings of Dalit and lower-caste saints

A substantial portion of the essay examines anti-caste teachings associated with Dalit and lower-caste saints, poets, and devotional traditions. Ayrookuzhiel presents these traditions as important critiques of caste hierarchy and ritual exclusivism.

The essay reproduces poems and devotional verses emphasising:

Ayrookuzhiel argues that these teachings challenged notions of purity and pollution while asserting the humanity and dignity of oppressed communities.

Purity, ritualism, and anti-caste spirituality

The essay strongly critiques ritualism, pilgrimage-centred religiosity, and notions of ritual purity associated with caste hierarchy. Through devotional poetry and folk traditions, Ayrookuzhiel highlights alternative spiritual traditions that valued compassion, interiority, equality, humility, and moral conduct above ritual observance.

Many of the quoted verses reject the idea that caste determines spiritual worth or human value. Others criticise pilgrimage rituals, priestly authority, scriptural exclusivism, and ritual purity codes. Ayrookuzhiel argues that these anti-caste religious traditions offer a framework for rethinking religion from the perspective of justice and human dignity.

The essay suggests that such traditions remain highly relevant for contemporary interreligious dialogue because caste-consciousness continues to affect multiple Indian religious communities.

Concluding perspective

A. M. A. Ayrookuzhiel concludes by arguing that anti-caste traditions among Dalits and lower-caste saints never developed strong institutional structures despite their moral and spiritual significance. Temple-centred religion, pilgrimage systems, ritual hierarchy, and caste-based social structures remained dominant within Indian society.

Nevertheless, the essay argues that modern Dalit movements, political mobilisation, literacy, rational thought, and anti-caste literature increasingly challenge older systems of ritual domination and caste-consciousness.

Ayrookuzhiel ultimately presents the anti-Brahmanical critique emerging from Dalit movements as a challenge not only to Hinduism but to all Indian religions shaped by caste hierarchy. The essay ends by asking whether interreligious dialogue in India can genuinely confront caste oppression and become a space for social and religious renewal.

Full text

→ Main article: Full Text: The Dalits, Religions and Interfaith Dialogue

Publication

This essay first appeared in Hindu-Christian Studies Bulletin, Vol. 7, 1994, pp. 13-19.

📄 This page was created on 27 May 2026. You can view its history on GitHub, preview the fileTip: Press Alt+Shift+G, or inspect the .