Religion, Spirituality and Aspirations of the People
Religion, Spirituality and Aspirations of the People is an essay by A. M. A. Ayrookuzhiel, first published in Religion and Society, Vol. XXV, No. 1, March 1978. Drawing on conversations with ordinary people in Kerala, the essay explores how people understand their aspirations in life and how they perceive the role of religion in relation to those aspirations. Ayrookuzhiel argues that aspirations for freedom, equality, fraternity, and social justice are widely shared, but that many people do not see religion as an effective force in achieving them. The essay further examines the implications of these perceptions for religious life, the study of Hinduism, and Hindu-Christian dialogue in contemporary India.
Contents
- Overview
- People’s Aspirations and the Role of Religion
- Freedom, Equality and Social Justice
- A ‘Spirituality of Combat’
- The Study of Hinduism in the Context of People’s Aspirations
- Hinduism in Dialogue with the Contemporary World
- Concluding Perspective
- Full Text
- Publication
Overview
The essay originated as a paper presented at a biennial meeting of the Christian Institute for the Study of Religion and Society (CISRS). Rather than beginning with theological theories or academic definitions, Ayrookuzhiel sought to understand how ordinary people themselves described their aspirations and how they evaluated the role of religion in their lives. Drawing upon conversations with a diverse group of individuals from the Cannanore District of Kerala, he examines the relationship between religion, social experience, and the pursuit of a meaningful life.
The essay combines these personal accounts with broader reflections on religious symbols such as Iswar, Karma, and Dharma, and considers how religious traditions respond to changing social realities.
People’s Aspirations and the Role of Religion
Ayrookuzhiel presents a series of personal accounts from people belonging to different occupations, social backgrounds, and ideological commitments. These include labourers, teachers, nurses, political activists, rationalists, and others. Although their experiences differ, many express similar concerns regarding dignity, opportunity, security, and participation in society.
Several respondents describe religion as offering personal consolation during times of difficulty. Others, however, question whether religion contributes meaningfully to solving the social and economic problems they face. In some cases religion is perceived as passive, ineffective, or even obstructive when confronted with issues such as caste discrimination, gender inequality, communal divisions, or restrictions on personal freedom.
The essay does not suggest that people have abandoned religion. Rather, it argues that many distinguish between private religious belief and the practical mechanisms through which social aspirations are pursued.
Freedom, Equality and Social Justice
A central argument of the essay is that people’s aspirations repeatedly converge around a small number of themes: freedom, equality, fraternity, and social justice. These aspirations appear in different forms, including demands for equality of status, equal opportunity, freedom from discrimination, dignity for women, communal harmony, and economic advancement.
Ayrookuzhiel notes that many of the people interviewed look not to religion but to education, employment, government action, labour organisation, rational inquiry, and social reform as the primary means of achieving these goals. Several respondents argue that religious institutions have historically failed to eliminate caste hierarchy, social inequality, or communal prejudice despite professing ideals of human unity and moral equality.
The essay highlights the contrast between religious teachings and the lived experiences of many people who continue to encounter exclusion, discrimination, and unequal access to power within society.
A ‘Spirituality of Combat’
In the second major part of the essay, Ayrookuzhiel reflects on the implications of these observations. He argues that the issue is not simply whether people are religious, since most continue to participate in religious traditions and to use religious concepts in understanding their lives. The deeper question is whether existing religious structures help to promote the aspirations people consider important.
Ayrookuzhiel suggests that many people see organisations such as labour unions, educational institutions, governments, and reform movements as more effective vehicles for advancing freedom, equality, and social justice than traditional religious structures. This perception leads him to ask whether religion requires what he calls a “spirituality of combat” rather than a spirituality of passive detachment.
The essay argues that if religion is understood as relevant to all dimensions of human life, it cannot remain indifferent to struggles for justice and social transformation. Religious traditions must therefore engage constructively with the aspirations emerging within contemporary society rather than confining themselves to narrowly spiritual concerns.
The Study of Hinduism in the Context of People’s Aspirations
Ayrookuzhiel extends this discussion to the study of Hinduism. He describes Hinduism as a complex system of symbols through which people understand themselves, society, and the world around them. These symbols include concepts such as Iswar, Karma, Dharma, rituals, spirits, and other elements of religious life.
The essay argues that these symbols cannot be studied as fixed and unchanging entities. People’s understandings of them are continually influenced by new experiences, social developments, and intellectual currents. Concepts associated with scientific knowledge, humanism, rational inquiry, social justice, and political movements increasingly interact with older religious meanings.
According to Ayrookuzhiel, a serious study of Hinduism must therefore pay attention not only to scriptures and classical interpretations but also to the changing meanings that ordinary people attach to religious symbols in contemporary life.
Hinduism in Dialogue with the Contemporary World
The essay presents dialogue as a broader social process rather than merely a formal exchange between religious specialists. Ayrookuzhiel argues that dialogue occurs through everyday interactions among people, institutions, movements, and communities within society.
From this perspective, Hinduism is continually engaged in dialogue with new ideas, social experiences, and cultural influences. Religious meanings evolve through participation in schools, political organisations, trade unions, voluntary associations, and other social structures. Dialogue is therefore understood as an organic process of cultural and intellectual development rather than a narrowly theological exercise.
Concluding Perspective
Ayrookuzhiel concludes that people’s aspirations provide an important context for understanding religion in contemporary India. The widespread desire for freedom, equality, fraternity, and social justice challenges religious communities to consider how their teachings, institutions, and social practices relate to these goals.
The essay argues that religion cannot remain isolated from the realities of social life if it wishes to remain meaningful to people. At the same time, the study of Hinduism must recognise the dynamic and evolving character of religious symbols as they interact with changing social conditions. The paper ultimately calls for forms of religious engagement and dialogue that take seriously the aspirations of ordinary people and their efforts to shape a more just society.
Full Text
Publication
This essay first appeared in Religion and Society, Vol. XXV, No. 1, March 1978.
📄 This page was created on 8 June 2026. You can view its history on GitHub, preview the fileTip: Press Alt+Shift+G, or inspect the .