Transparency and MDGs: The Role of the Media and Technology – Key Quotes From Sixth Panel

Transparency and MDGs: The Role of the Media and Technology – Key Quotes From Sixth Panel is a compilation of remarks published on 25 August 2010 on the Right2Info-MDGs platform. The page brings together selected quotes from speakers at a panel discussion examining the relationship between transparency, information flows, media, and development outcomes. It includes a contribution from Sunil Abraham of the Centre for Internet and Society.

Contents

  1. Article Details
  2. Full Text
  3. Context and Background

Article Details

📰 Published on:
Right2Info MDGs
📅 Date:
25 August 2010
📄 Type:
Event summary / Quote compilation
📰 Article Link:
Not available online

Full Text

"We are thinking globally, acting locally. We take the bottom-up approach with radio for people in the community to tell their government what they need and to partake in decision making process."
— Lucy Maathai, Slums Information Development and Resource Centers, Kenya

"For HIV/AIDS in Botswana during the 1990s, we tried creating big billboards saying 'get tested', we tried working through NGOs, but it was not until we also got local churches and local tribal leaders together, that things changed. We had to focus on getting buy-in from the political leadership and every local leader. UNDEF was set up to fill the gaps between UN agencies like UNICEF, UNDP, etc. What I have seen in Botswana and 30 years of experience, is that if we always add information and communication at the end, we will fail. Rather we need to make sure that it is integrated all along. Furthermore, people in Botswana are aware of technologies, but they do not feel that they can use it or are supported to use it. Instead they use traditional methods, such as churches, in bars, and with local tribal leaders. The UN are mostly used to dealing with formal institutions, but in order to help the bottom billion in the world, we need to engage with the informal institutions, sometimes even with the 'bad guys'."
— Bjoern Ferde, UNDP Oslo Center, Norway

"If a transparency system is based on suspicion rather than trust, it breeds corruption. If your demand for transparency and accountability undermines social safety nets, you will undermine your entire argument. Transparency may seem to add to accountability, but we must understand that it often undermines privacy (in the Gujarat genocide, Muslims were found and killed by rioters using tax and electoral records). In addition, in India, a name alone reveals a lot of information on caste, area and religion, so what is normal in the West – disclosing names – is not always a good idea. Finally, in many places, particularly those in conflict, disclosing your income may lead to groups turning up at your door and demanding a share."
— Sunil Abraham, Centre for Internet and Society, India

"It's great what ARTICLE 19 is doing. There's often a lot of discussion within communities, but not so often discussions between communities. I want to connect the media too. So little has been done at the international level on how information and communication help development. We do need to acknowledge that the media has massive advantages as an information and transparency mechanism. If you ask politicians what they are worried about in regards to transparency, they are worried about the media. In Peru, a report states that Fujimori bribed media executives 100x the amount that he bribed a judge. Indeed, there are so few people paid within UN organisations to focus on understanding and using communication to effect people's lives. We are operating in a strategic vacuum. It's hugely exciting to work out where we can go in the future. This event takes us a long way forward."
— James Deane, BBC World Trust, UK

"There are simple and creative ways to demonstrate information, such as the 'stone' test. In Botswana, each person in a village was asked to place a stone in the middle of the group for every person that died due to HIV/AIDS. It created an immediate and devastating effect when people suddenly visualised the effect on their community and then collectively began to think about what that meant in regards to families and society."
— Bjoern Ferde, UNDP Oslo Center, Norway

"In the south we call the media the fourth estate – a moral and ethical force to protect democracy and the constitution of our country. In the north however, we have a business model which completely removes any sense of ethics. The Indian Express, for example, will only talk about markets, not about people and their lives in poverty. Furthermore, whilst we want information shared, we do not want the information collected by the state to destroy the people."
— Aruna Roy, MKSS

Back to Top ⇧

Context and Background

This compilation was published in the lead-up to the 2010 United Nations Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) Summit. During this period, there was increasing emphasis on the role of transparency, access to information, and communication systems in shaping development outcomes.

The panel brought together practitioners from civil society, international organisations, and media to reflect on how information flows operate in practice, particularly in contexts marked by inequality or conflict. The remarks highlight tensions between transparency and privacy, the limits of technocratic solutions, and the importance of local institutions in development processes.

Sunil Abraham’s contribution reflects concerns that transparency measures, if designed without contextual safeguards, can expose vulnerable populations to harm. His remarks situate debates on accountability within broader questions of social structure, identity, and the uneven effects of information disclosure.

📄 This page was created on 15 April 2026. You can view its history on GitHub, preview the fileTip: Press Alt+Shift+G, or inspect the .