Indian PM Narendra Modi's Digital Dream Gets Bad Reception
Indian PM Narendra Modi’s Digital Dream Gets Bad Reception is The Australian article by Amanda Hodge, published on 29 September 2015. The report contrasts Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Digital India pitch to Silicon Valley executives with the ground reality of an internet shutdown in Kashmir, and draws on inputs from Sunil Abraham, who commented on government surveillance tendencies and the risks that large tech investments pose to net neutrality.
Contents
Article Details
- 📰 Published in:
- The Australian
- 📅 Date:
- 29 September 2015
- 👤 Author:
- Amanda Hodge
- 📄 Type:
- News Report
- 📰 Newspaper Link:
- Not available online
Full Text
As Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi told Silicon Valley's most powerful chief executives this week how his government "attacked poverty by using the power of networks and mobile phones'', the entire population of the state of Kashmir remained offline — by order of the state.
"I see technology as a means to empower and as a tool that bridges the distance between hope and opportunity," Mr Modi said yesterday on a trip in which he will also discuss development at the UN.
Earlier, in a "town hall" meeting with Facebook chief Mark Zuckerberg Mr Modi hailed the power of social media networks that gave governments the opportunity to correct themselves "every five minutes", rather than every five years.
His remarks during his Digital India tour of the US west coast sparked a storm of Twitter protest.
The northern state's former chief minister Omar Abdullah, who noted the "irony of listening to Prime Minister Modi lecturing about connected digital India, while we are totally disconnected".
The ban on mobile and broadband internet in Jammu and Kashmir was imposed last Friday, the beginning of the Muslim holiday of Eid-ul-Zuha during which animals are slaughtered and the meat fed to the poor, for fear social media could inflame tensions over the state government's decision to enforce a beef ban.
It was to have lasted 24 hours but — notwithstanding Twitter feedback — was extended twice as a "precautionary" measure.
As Mr Modi outlined his dreams of a broadband network connecting the country's most remote communities, millions of New Delhi mobile phone users continued their daily wrestle with line dropouts.
"We are bringing technology, transparency, efficiency, ease and effectiveness in governance," he said, as in New Delhi the government talked of pulling down more mobile towers.
Centre for Internet and Society director Sunil Abraham said yesterday: "Schizophrenia between rhetoric and reality (on digital policy) is the global standard for all world leaders.
"Politicians in opposition are invariably opposed to surveillance and in favour of free speech but the very day that politician assumes office even if it is someone as splendid as Barack Obama, they change their opinions on these topics and become pro-surveillance and pro-censorship."
Certainly successive Indian governments have had a patchy record on such issues. Last March India's activist Supreme Court struck down a controversial section of the Information Technology Act which made posting information of a "grossly offensive or menacing character" punishable by up to three years' jail.
That month police in northern Uttar Pradesh arrested a teenager for a Facebook post, which they said "carried derogatory language against a community".
Previous cases under the former Congress-led government include that of a university professor detained for posting a cartoon about the chief minister of West Bengal and the arrest of two young women over a Facebook post criticising the shutdown of Mumbai following the death of a Hindu right politician.
While Mr Modi's government welcomed the Supreme Court ruling as a "landmark day for freedom of speech and expression", last month it attempted to block 857 random porn sites.
Notwithstanding the gulf between Mr Modi's digital dream rhetoric and the reality at home, his second US visit in 17 months has reaped dividends. Google has committed to a joint initiative to roll out free Wi-Fi to 500 railway stations across the country, and Qualcomm has pledged a $US150 million ($213m) tech startup fund.
But Mr Abraham warned of the potential for such investments to compromise net neutrality — the principle of allowing internet users access to all content and applications.
Context and Background
This article was written as Prime Minister Modi visited the United States on his second trip in 17 months, with Digital India as a central theme of his engagements. The timing made the contrast with Kashmir’s internet shutdown particularly pointed: the same week Modi was speaking to Silicon Valley chiefs about connectivity as a tool of governance, a state government was using an internet blackout as a tool of control.
The piece also captures a tension that was prominent in Indian tech policy debates that year: large foreign investments in infrastructure and platforms were being welcomed at the national level, while questions about net neutrality, surveillance, and free speech remained unresolved. Sunil Abraham’s remarks on the gap between opposition-era and in-office attitudes to surveillance drew on patterns visible across multiple governments in India and elsewhere.
The article is one of a number of international press pieces in 2015 in which Abraham provided comment and context on India’s digital governance contradictions, particularly around censorship, internet shutdowns, and the regulatory environment for platforms.
📄 This page was created on 28 May 2026. You can view its history on GitHub, preview the fileTip: Press Alt+Shift+G, or inspect the .