ID Programme Faces First Challenge over Privacy, Data
ID Programme Faces First Challenge over Privacy, Data is a Mint report by Venkatesha Babu and Karen Leigh, published on 28 April 2010. The piece covers the first organised legal challenge to the government’s Aadhaar programme, with around 100 NGOs including the Centre for Internet and Society planning to take the government to court over privacy, data safety, and the absence of parliamentary oversight. It quotes Sunil Abraham, then executive director of the Centre for Internet and Society, on the risks of centralised data storage and the potential for discrimination.
Contents
Article Details
- 📰 Published in:
- Mint
- 📅 Date:
- 28 April 2010
- 👤 Authors:
- Venkatesha Babu and Karen Leigh
- 📄 Type:
- News Report
- 📰 Article Link:
- Not available online
Full Text
BANGALORE/NEW DELHI: In the first significant challenge to the government's ambitious programme to give more than one billion Indians a unique identification number, a group of NGOs (non-governmental organizations) are planning to take the government to court over a range of issues, including concerns over privacy and the safety of information.
About 100 NGOs, including Alternative Law Forum, Centre for Internet and Society, People's Union for Civil Liberty and Slum Jagathu, have come together to oppose the implementation of the project in its current form, Mathew Thomas, general secretary of Citizens' Action Forum, said in Bangalore on Wednesday.
The Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) "is not a statutory body, not having been created by any Act or under any law, but by executive fiat", he said. "It is set up as an appendage to the Planning Commission. It cannot be scrutinized either by Parliament or the Comptroller and Auditor General."
In what had been expected to become a hurdle to the project, those against it are citing data protection and privacy, factors that led to the failure of a similar initiative in the UK.
"The government could not prevent recent cyber attacks by Chinese hackers on its own websites. What guarantee is there that a centralized database would be safe?" said Sunil Abraham, executive director of Centre for Internet and Society, one of the groups opposed to the ID programme, which has been named Aadhaar. "Also, data collected might be misused to discriminate against minorities and other vulnerable sections of society."
R.S. Sharma, UIDAI director general, declined to comment in detail.
"Everything is transparent. Whatever we have been doing, we have been putting it on our website," he said. "As to their specific complaints, I will not be able to respond over the telephone."
The NGOs are also questioning the cost of the project and why no feasibility study was conducted. UIDAI is headed by Nandan Nilekani, co-founder and former chief executive of Infosys Technologies Ltd, India's second largest software firm.
"First, the government has to respond how the chairman was chosen and appointed," Thomas said. "Would the same person in his earlier organization authorize a project involving thousands of crores without a preliminary project report on feasibility? Public money is being spent without accountability."
Nilekani wasn't reachable for comment.
The government is looking to the ID programme to help ensure that various welfare programmes reach the poor. This objective would be difficult to achieve, the NGOs said.
"In a country with 48% illiteracy, a 12-digit card might prove to be a handicap instead of help," they said in a release. "The project in its present form must be scrapped."
The NGOs also said that projected savings from the stemming of leakages owing to the ID programme were not authenticated or backed by independent data. "It's surprising that the project is being implemented with no discussion in Parliament nor consultation with other political parties," they said.
Context and Background
The article appeared two days after the press conference covered in The Hindu report of 29 April 2010, and the two pieces together reflect the same coordinated civil society push against the UID project that week. The Mint report adds the specific threat of legal action and brings in the UIDAI’s response, making it a more complete account of the confrontation.
Sunil Abraham’s quoted concern about cyber attacks on government websites was not hypothetical. Reports of Chinese hacking attempts on Indian government infrastructure had circulated in the months prior, and the argument that a centralised biometric database would present a far larger target carried practical weight. His second point, about the potential for data misuse against minorities, anticipated debates that would continue for years around the Aadhaar programme.
📄 This page was created on 15 April 2026. You can view its history on GitHub, preview the fileTip: Press Alt+Shift+G, or inspect the .