Facebook Is Censoring Some Posts on Indian Kashmir
Facebook Is Censoring Some Posts on Indian Kashmir is a The Washington Post WorldViews article by Rama Lakshmi, published on 27 July 2016. The report covers accounts of filmmakers, activists, and journalists whose Facebook accounts were disabled after they posted content related to the violence in Kashmir, and quotes Sunil Abraham, then Executive Director of the Centre for Internet and Society (CIS), who suggested the removals appeared to be proactive platform compliance rather than government-directed censorship.
Contents
Article Details
- 📰 Published in:
- The Washington Post
- 📅 Date:
- 27 July 2016
- 👤 Author:
- Rama Lakshmi
- 📄 Type:
- News Report
- 📰 Newspaper Link:
- Read Online (Subscription needed)
Full Text
NEW DELHI — Film makers, activists and journalists accused Facebook of blocking their accounts this week after they posted messages and images related to the violence in the trouble-torn province of Kashmir.
In recent weeks, the India-administered, Muslim-majority Kashmir state has been facing violence and curfews after protests erupted against the killing of a popular leader of a terrorist group.
As people posted images, videos and stories about police violence and people injured by pellet wounds on Facebook, some discovered their accounts were disabled.
On Monday, the account of Arif Ayaz Parrey, an editor with an environmental magazine in New Delhi, was disabled for more than a day. He administers the Facebook account of a discussion group called the Kashmir Solidarity Network, whose page was also removed.
"The Kashmir Solidarity page was started by a Kashmiri anthropology student in New York. This is not a hate forum, we share stories," Parrey said.
More than 47 people have died and hundreds injured in angry clashes between the police and protesters in Kashmir this month, the worst outbreak of bloody violence in six years in the region claimed by both India and neighboring Pakistan.
Authorities banned newspapers for four days and restored cellphone service on Wednesday after it was out for 20 days.
"Our Community Standards prohibit content that praises or supports terrorists, terrorist organizations or terrorism, and we remove it as soon as we're made aware of it," said a Facebook spokesman in India. "We welcome discussion on these subjects but any terrorist content has to be clearly put in a context which condemns these organizations or their violent activities."
India and the United States topped the list of governments that request Facebook for details of accounts in the second half of 2015.
India has more than 340 million mobile Internet users and has the second largest number of Facebook users after the United States. The company is seeking to expand its footprint here by introducing a pared down version called "Free Basics." But earlier this year, New Delhi shot it down, saying service providers cannot charge discriminatory prices for Internet users.
A journalist in Kashmir said that many who shared stories about a new band of militants and videos of police brutality have been blocked.
"It looks more like Facebook censorship rather than something initiated by the government. Maybe they are trying to please the government proactively," said Sunil Abraham, executive director of Center for Internet and Society. "Nevertheless it will have a chilling effect. You will think twice before exercising free speech on Facebook now."
Ather Zia, a political commentator from Kashmir who teaches anthropology at the University of Northern Colorado, said after her account was disabled on Tuesday: "It is safe to assume creating awareness for Kashmir using social media or writing about the ground reality is under severe threat."
Meanwhile, users struggled to restore their accounts on Wednesday as they uploaded new documents requested by the company.
"I use my Facebook account not as a personal page to tell people about my last haircut or last holiday. I use it for work, I share media stories about whatever bothers me in the universe," said Sanjay Kak, a documentary film maker whose account was disabled Tuesday. "Nothing I shared can be considered inflammatory or incendiary."
Context and Background
The article was published during a period of heightened unrest in Jammu and Kashmir following the killing of Burhan Wani, a commander of the Hizbul Mujahideen militant group, on 8 July 2016. The violence that followed led to curfews, media restrictions, and a prolonged internet and mobile phone shutdown in the valley, making social media platforms one of the few available channels for people to share information about events on the ground.
Sunil Abraham’s framing of the account disabling as likely proactive platform compliance, rather than a response to a direct government order, pointed to a pattern in which platforms apply their community standards in ways that effectively align with government interests without an explicit legal requirement to do so. The article was published the same month that India’s rejection of Facebook’s Free Basics service had already placed the platform under scrutiny regarding its conduct in the Indian market.
External Link
- Read on The Washington Post (Subscription needed)
📄 This page was created on 30 April 2026. You can view its history on GitHub, preview the fileTip: Press Alt+Shift+G, or inspect the .