Centre Draws Red Lines for WhatsApp Over Fake News, Says Must Comply With Indian Laws

Centre Draws Red Lines for WhatsApp Over Fake News, Says Must Comply With Indian Laws is a Hindustan Times report published on 21 August 2018. The article documents a meeting between Union minister Ravi Shankar Prasad and WhatsApp CEO Chris Daniels, during which the Indian government outlined three key demands: establishing a local corporate entity, appointing a grievance officer in India, and complying with Indian laws, against the backdrop of at least 30 lynchings linked to rumours spread on the platform.

Contents

  1. Article Details
  2. Full Text
  3. Context and Background
  4. External Link

Article Details

📰 Published in:
Hindustan Times
📅 Date:
21 August 2018
👤 Authors:
Nakul Sridhar
📄 Type:
News Report
📰 Newspaper Link:
Read Online

Full Text

The Union government on Tuesday told the Facebook-owned WhatsApp to comply with Indian law, set up an Indian entity, and appoint a grievance officer in India whom people can reach immediately.

The directive comes at a time when the government has pulled up the company for fake news spread on the social media platform serving as a contributory factor in several incidents of mob lynching across the country.

Ravi Shankar Prasad, Minister for Electronics and Information Technology, conveyed this to the global head of WhatsApp, Chris Daniels, who is in India this week. This is the first time that the government has spelt out its key expectations from the platform.

"I told him there have been sinister developments like fake news and revenge porn, which are criminal and against Indian laws. I suggested three points: they must have a grievance officer in India; they must comply with Indian laws; and they must have a local, corporate entity in India," Prasad said.

Daniels, he added, had agreed to the three conditions. WhatsApp did not offer an independent confirmation or respond to questions.

Prasad said he also told Daniels that WhatsApp would have to comply with Reserve Bank of India (RBI) guidelines to start its payments services in India, saying that the firm would have to store the financial data it collects from India within the country.

After at least 30 lynchings in the past one year were linked to rumours and fake news spread through the WhatsApp platform, the IT ministry sent two notices to the company last month, asking it to curb the spread of such messages. WhatsApp's chief operating officer, Matthew Idema, had met the IT ministry secretary Ajay Sawhney towards the end of July to discuss the issue of fake news with the ministry and explain the steps it was taking in curbing its spread.

The application made it more difficult to forward media by removing shortcuts, limited the number of people a forwarded message can be sent to at a time to five, and introduced a 'forwarded' label for such messages after the push from the government.

Explaining its broad approach, a top government functionary, who asked not to be named, said, "We cannot accept digital imperialism. India is an open society. We have embraced technology and innovation. But no one should think they can come and do as they like. Firms like WhatsApp must conform to our rules, laws, and address problems."

Reiterating his demand that WhatsApp must find "a technological solution" to trace the origin of rumour-mongering messages, Prasad said, "It does not need rocket science to locate a message being circulated thousands and lakhs of times on the same day, on the same issue, in the same district and same state." He said Daniels agreed to comply.

But experts believe that delivering on these demands will be challenging. "WhatsApp, according to my understanding, does not store metadata (such as phone number sent from) for text messages that are transmitted using their application or via the web client. Unfortunately, WhatsApp does not make this explicit in their public documentation," said Sunil Abraham, founder of the think tank, Centre for Internet and Society.

"Therefore, many governments erroneously believe that sources of specific messages can be determined by big data analysis similar to the analysis of SMS metadata from telecom operators," he said.

Metadata includes information such as the sender and recipient, date and time. "Now it would also include whether the message is forwarded," said Abraham.

Back to Top ⇧

Context and Background

This article appeared during a critical phase in India’s reckoning with misinformation and mob violence linked to social media platforms. Between 2017 and mid-2018, at least 30 people had been killed in lynchings triggered by rumours—many involving fabricated child-lifting accusations—that spread rapidly through WhatsApp groups in rural and semi-urban areas. The incidents drew sharp criticism of the platform’s design features, particularly the ease with which unverified content could be forwarded to large audiences without context or attribution.

The government’s intervention marked an escalation in regulatory pressure on WhatsApp, which had previously received two notices from the IT ministry demanding action to curb misinformation. The three conditions laid out by Ravi Shankar Prasad—local incorporation, appointment of a grievance officer, and adherence to Indian laws—represented an assertion of jurisdictional authority over platforms that had operated with minimal physical presence in India. The additional demand for data localisation, particularly for payment services, reflected broader governmental concerns about data sovereignty and regulatory oversight.

The minister’s call for WhatsApp to develop technological solutions to trace message origins posed a fundamental challenge to the platform’s end-to-end encryption model. Experts highlighted that WhatsApp’s architecture, unlike traditional SMS networks, did not retain metadata enabling retrospective tracing of message pathways. This technical constraint placed the government’s demands at odds with the platform’s privacy framework, raising questions about whether compliance would require compromising encryption or implementing alternative traceability mechanisms. The tension between state demands for accountability and platform commitments to user privacy became a defining feature of India’s digital governance debates in subsequent years.

📄 This page was created on 29 December 2025. You can view its history on GitHub, preview the fileTip: Press Alt+Shift+G, or inspect the .