Temporary 16-Digit Virtual ID To Secure Aadhaar Data Privacy: 10 Points
Temporary 16-Digit Virtual ID To Secure Aadhaar Data Privacy: 10 Points is an explainer published by NDTV on 10 January 2018, written by Aloke Tikku. The article reports on UIDAI’s decision to let Aadhaar holders authenticate themselves using a randomly generated 16-digit Virtual ID instead of their Aadhaar number, in response to heightened privacy concerns after a media investigation into unauthorised database access. It also sets out a 10-point rollout roadmap and notes that researchers such as Sunil Abraham had long advocated such tokenisation to reduce over-collection and storage of Aadhaar numbers by user agencies.
Contents
Article Details
- 📰 Published in:
- NDTV
- ✍️ Author:
- Aloke Tikku (Editor)
- 📅 Date:
- 10 January 2018
- 📄 Type:
- Explainer
- 📰 Section:
- All India
- 📰 Newspaper Link:
- Read Online
Full Text
New Delhi: People can share a randomly-generated 16-digit temporary number instead of their Aadhaar number starting from March-end to authenticate their identity for various services. The UIDAI - the authority that runs the government's Aadhaar programme - said today the initiative, which is aimed at minimising instances of leak and misuse of Aadhaar numbers, would enhance privacy of the 119 crore people issued the identification number. The UIDAI, which had been working on the "Virtual ID" for months, made the announcement at a time privacy concerns around Aadhaar peaked after a newspaper expose on unauthorised access of its database earlier this month.
Here are the 10 points on this story:
Context and Background
This explainer marked a moment when UIDAI tried to contain growing criticism that Aadhaar’s architecture exposed people to unnecessary privacy risks by allowing widespread storage of their core identifier. Instead of altering the central database, the authority proposed a tokenisation layer, asking users to present short-lived Virtual IDs so that most agencies no longer needed to handle or keep Aadhaar numbers directly.
By distinguishing between “global authentication agencies” that could still store Aadhaar numbers and “local” agencies confined to tokens, the circular tacitly acknowledged that earlier policies had been too permissive about KYC entities keeping permanent identifiers. Civil society organisations such as the Centre for Internet and Society, which had long argued that the system trusted user agencies far too much, treated the change as partial vindication yet warned that effective protection would depend on strict enforcement and real limits on retention and reuse.
External Link
📄 This page was created on 22 December 2025. You can view its history on GitHub, preview the fileTip: Press Alt+Shift+G, or inspect the .