Indian Activists Slam FCC Decision to Ditch Net Neutrality

Indian Activists Slam FCC Decision to Ditch Net Neutrality is a Hindustan Times Tech article published on 23 November 2017. The report features reactions from Indian net neutrality campaigners to the US Federal Communications Commission’s announcement that it would scrap Obama-era protections. The piece includes commentary from Nikhil Pahwa, Apar Gupta and Sunil Abraham on regulatory approaches and India’s contrasting policy trajectory.

Contents

  1. Article Details
  2. Full Text
  3. Context and Background
  4. External Link

Article Details

📰 Published in:
Hindustan Times
📅 Date:
23 November 2017
👤 Authors:
Kul Bhushan
📄 Type:
News Report
📰 Newspaper Link:
Read Online

Full Text

Net neutrality is in the news again. This time it is because the US' Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has decided to formally scrap existing protections that are meant to keep access to internet equitable.

India had its own tryst with the idea of net neutrality after it blocked the zero-rating programmes by social networking giant Facebook — which proposed to rollout the Internet.org or Free Basics project in February last year.

A powerful social media campaign made Facebook back down and the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) to announce that 'differential pricing' — a practice where some services or sites are priced in a special manner — will no longer be allowed.

Some people who were at the forefront of the net neutrality campaign in here almost three years ago have expressed their displeasure over the FCC's move.

"I think the approach the FCC is taking is flawed. Spectrum is a public resource and it needs to be spent on maximisation of public good. That public good, and the utility of the Internet is based on the freedom that people have to create new apps and services, without needing permission from ISPs, or the fear that ISPs might discriminate against them or favour their competitors. This is what net neutrality enables," said Nikhil Pahwa, founder of publication Medianama and one of the activists.

"By going against Net Neutrality, FCC chairman Ajit Pai is attacking the core of what makes the Internet tick. We didn't let that happen in India, and instead, focused on increasing competition between ISPs and telecom operators, because of which we've seen broadband prices drop, quality of service improve, a tremendous growth in Internet users in India. For this, we owe a great debt to all those who supported Net Neutrality, especially the TRAI," he added.

Apar Gupta, who is closely associated with the 'Save the Internet' initiative and is the co-founder of Internet Freedom Foundation, said, "FCC's move to take back the internet order is a huge setback to the global campaign to ensure open internet because it undermines the net neutrality."

"I don't think the development should impact the regulatory process in India considering TRAI's strong support for net neutrality. I hope that TRAI comes out with a comprehensive network neutrality regulation in the future," he responded when asked about the possible impact on India of the FCC move.

Sunil Abraham, executive director of Bangalore-based research organisation Centre for Internet and Society, said there should be no impact on India from the FCC move.

He also slammed FCC chief Pai's attempt to change the existing net neutrality rules. "What Ajit Pai is trying to do he's not saying he will not regulate. He is saying when companies violate net neutrality principles they should be transparent about it. He hopes the magic of market competition will help resolve the problem," he said.

"Pai's approach to the net neutrality might work in a market where there is a lot of competition. In the US, there is no competition and that in case damage will be immediate," he added.

Back to Top ⇧

Context and Background

FCC Chairman Ajit Pai announced his proposal to roll back Title II classification of internet service providers on 21 November 2017, setting up a 14 December vote. The plan reversed 2015 rules that treated ISPs as common carriers, barring paid prioritisation, blocking and throttling. Pai argued these regulations stifled investment and innovation, proposing instead that the Federal Trade Commission handle enforcement through transparency requirements and post-hoc sanctions.

Indian activists interviewed for this report had successfully mobilised public opposition to Facebook’s Free Basics programme in 2015–2016. That campaign culminated in TRAI’s February 2016 prohibition on differential pricing for data services. The coalition behind Save The Internet included MediaNama’s Nikhil Pahwa, lawyer Apar Gupta and the Centre for Internet and Society led by Sunil Abraham. Their submissions to TRAI emphasised preserving an open internet and preventing gatekeeping by platforms or telcos.

The contrasting US-India trajectories reflected divergent regulatory philosophies. India’s TRAI maintained strong support for network neutrality principles even as American policy shifted towards deregulation under the Trump administration. The experts quoted here expressed confidence that India’s framework would remain insulated from FCC decisions, though they acknowledged concerns about global precedent-setting effects on internet governance debates.

📄 This page was created on 3 January 2026. You can view its history on GitHub, preview the fileTip: Press Alt+Shift+G, or inspect the .