For India's Complaints Department, Visit Facebook Live

For India’s Complaints Department, Visit Facebook Live is a Financial Times opinion piece by Amy Kazmin examining how Indians use social media, including Facebook Live and Twitter, to raise grievances and hold public authorities to account. It quotes Sunil Abraham on shifting power structures in who gets heard.

Contents

  1. Article Details
  2. Full Text
  3. Context and Background
  4. External Link

Article Details

📰 Published in:
Financial Times
👤 Author:
Amy Kazmin
📅 Date:
23 January 2017
📄 Type:
Opinion
📰 Publication Link:
Read Online

Full Text

Rarely has a soldier's lament about bad food received such attention. But Tej Bahadur Yadav, of India's Border Security Force, made national headlines with Facebook videos complaining about his rations along India's tense line-of-control with neighbouring Pakistan.

Standing against a landscape of desolate, snow-covered mountains, Mr Yadav bemoaned the fried flatbread and tea that constitutes breakfast, and the watery lentils, seasoned only with salt and turmeric, of his lunch. It was unclear whether his main complaint was about the poor cooking quality or limited food quantity but the video of the offending meals, including a burnt chapati, suggested both.

"I do not want to blame the government," he said calmly in Hindi. "The government provides everything for us but these higher officers sell everything. Sometimes, we soldiers go hungry."

Reaction to the videos, which were covered widely by the mainstream media, came fast and furious. The BSF publicly accused Mr Yadav of indiscipline, saying he was a chronic malcontent previously subjected to a court martial for aiming his weapon at a superior. It also noted he was taking voluntary retirement soon.

But many Indians found it easy to believe that their country's troops are short-changed on food and they rallied to the disgruntled soldier as a courageous whistleblower. Prime Minister Narendra Modi ordered an investigation, and a dietitian was reportedly sent to the border to assess the soldiers' food.

Analysts pointed out that Mr Yadav's gripe echoed official critiques of deficiencies in the army's food procurement. "One can imagine the toil our jawans [junior soldiers] go through while guarding the border in chilling conditions. And the least they can expect is a good meal after long hours of hard duty," an Indian Express editorial declared.

That a soldier posted in a remote border area could unleash such a kerfuffle via a video highlights how Indians armed with mobile phones are taking to social media to hold to account the traditionally non-responsive political and bureaucratic establishment.

Smartphones make up nearly 30 per cent of phones in use in India and that number is rising fast, according to the Asian research group CLSA.

Sushma Swaraj, India's foreign minister, has garnered attention for her rapid responses to individual Twitter pleas for help — whether from Indians in trouble abroad or those struggling to renew a passport or secure a visa for a visitor.

Now other ministers and government agencies, including local police forces, have begun to respond personally to pleas for help and public complaints on Twitter. It's a big change from a time I recall well, when Indians tangled in red tape had no option but to find those with connections to try to influence, or prod, the seemingly impenetrable bureaucracy.

"Bureaucrats and politicians are now active and available on social media — ordinary citizens tweet politicians and there is a spectacle of immediate redress of complaints," Sunil Abraham, executive director of the Bangalore-based Centre for Internet and Society, told me.

When New Delhi's police department set up an office to receive complaints against corrupt officers, for example, many citizens provided audio or visual recordings of the alleged wrongdoing. It's only a matter of time before such footage finds its way to social media — or beyond.

Ironically, those whose plights gain traction on social media, and are then amplified by mainstream media, are sometimes low-ranking civil servants harassed by their superiors.

This week brought news of a female railway clerk punished for dereliction of duty after she refused to sing "one particular" duet with her senior manager at his farewell party.

A friend who works for a major western social media platform here in India (who ironically can't be identified as he wasn't authorised to speak to me), tells me that "the power structures that governed who used to be heard and who wouldn't be heard have changed". As technology spreads further and deeper in India, we can expect that noise to amplify.

Back to Top ⇧

Context and Background

The article reflects a period when social media platforms were beginning to alter how citizens in India engaged with the state. As smartphone adoption increased and platforms like Facebook and Twitter gained prominence, individuals found new avenues to raise grievances that would previously have been confined to bureaucratic channels.

The case of Tej Bahadur Yadav illustrates how digital visibility can transform a local complaint into a national issue. The speed with which the video attracted attention, and the subsequent institutional response, underscored a shift in accountability mechanisms, where public pressure mediated through online platforms could prompt official action.

At the same time, the article situates this shift within a broader administrative context. India’s governance structures have historically been associated with procedural delays and limited accessibility. Social media, in this setting, began functioning as an informal interface between citizens and the state, reshaping expectations around responsiveness without necessarily replacing formal institutional processes.

📄 This page was created on 21 March 2026. You can view its history on GitHub, preview the fileTip: Press Alt+Shift+G, or inspect the .