C-DoT's Surveillance System Making Enemies on Internet
C-DoT’s Surveillance System Making Enemies on Internet is a DNA India article published on 21 March 2014 by Krishna Bahirwani. The report discusses India’s Central Monitoring System developed by C-DoT, highlighting international criticism that it enables expansive electronic surveillance with limited transparency or oversight.
Contents
Article Details
- 📰 Published in:
- DNA India
- 📅 Date:
- 21 March 2014
- 👤 Author:
- Krishna Bahirwani
- 📄 Type:
- News Report
- 📰 Newspaper Link:
- Read Online
Full Text
The Central Monitoring System (CMS) developed by the Centre for Development of Telematics (C-DoT) has come under fire from a France-based non-profit organisation, which claims the system has the capacity to directly snoop on all forms of communications over phone and internet, without involving telecom operators.
The NGO's Reporters Without Boundaries report 2014, 'Enemies of the Internet' has equated C-DoT with Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) in the UK, and the US's National Security Agency (NSA), which recently came under criticism for spying on citizens.
CMS, India's mass electronic surveillance system, was rolled out in 2013.
Before the CMS, tapping was done by the telecom operators, but not before taking prior permission. The CMS gives direct access to C-DoT employees and law-enforcement agencies.
CMS has created an automated front containing central and regional databases, which central and state government agencies can use to intercept and monitor any landline, mobile or internet connection in India.
Minister of state for information technology Milind Deora said, "The new data collection system will actually improve citizens' privacy because telecommunications companies would no longer be directly involved in the surveillance."
Asked what would prevent C-DoT employees, who would have access to data, from misusing it, Deora said, "There is a switching mechanism (that) diverts the call to law-enforcement agencies and eliminates layers. The existing surveillance and interception system is actually insecure as the operator, people from the home ministry and other government officials have access to the data. The CMS will erase such people from play."
"I want the people to know the design aspects and how the system is being used for lawful interceptions, so that they can shed their inhibitions. We do not want to put power in the hands of the bureaucrats," he said.
Harold D'Costa, a cyber security expert who trains Maharashtra and Goa police, said, "It's possible that employees of C-DoT or law enforcement agencies could use the information gathered by CMS for personal or political use although 43 and 43A of the IT Act would protect people when something like that happens and will give the person compensation."
He said, "There should be more transparency with regard to CMS".
Sunil Abraham, executive director of Bangalore-based non-profit Centre for Internet and Society, said the mistaken assumption in their thinking is technology will serve as a check and balance.
"Technology can always be compromised," he said. "There is no way to find out about what is actually going on. If the CMS is abused it is very difficult to prove."
Deora said a privacy law is being drafted to address these issues. Last month, a parliamentary standing committee rejected the government claim that the IT Act protects citizens' privacy. The committee, chaired by former Congress MP Rao Inderjit Singh, said, "The committee is extremely unhappy to note that the government is yet to institute a legal framework on privacy."
Context and Background
This article was published in March 2014, shortly after the rollout of India’s Central Monitoring System (CMS), a centralised surveillance infrastructure developed by the Centre for Development of Telematics. The system attracted public attention following its inclusion in Reporters Without Borders’ 2014 Enemies of the Internet report, which compared India’s technical surveillance capabilities with those of other countries engaged in large-scale electronic monitoring.
The report reflects growing international and domestic concern over the expansion of interception technologies without corresponding public clarity on how such systems operate in practice. CMS was presented by the government as a mechanism to streamline lawful interception by reducing reliance on telecom operators and consolidating access within authorised agencies.
At the same time, civil society groups and technical experts expressed unease about the concentration of surveillance capabilities within a central system. Questions were raised about transparency, accountability, and the effectiveness of internal safeguards against misuse, particularly in the absence of a dedicated privacy law.
Government representatives defended CMS as an improvement over earlier interception arrangements, arguing that automation and reduced intermediaries would strengthen security and privacy protections. Critics, however, cautioned that technical controls alone could not substitute for legal and institutional oversight.
The article situates these competing claims within a broader debate that was unfolding in India at the time, as surveillance infrastructure expanded faster than the legal frameworks intended to govern it.
External Link
📄 This page was created on 6 February 2026. You can view its history on GitHub, preview the fileTip: Press Alt+Shift+G, or inspect the .