BSNL Website Hacked by Anonymous India

BSNL Website Hacked by Anonymous India is a news report published by The Times of India on 13 December 2012, written by Kim Arora. The article documents the defacement of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited’s website by the hacktivist collective Anonymous India, carried out in solidarity with cartoonist Aseem Trivedi’s hunger strike against Section 66A of the IT Act. The piece features commentary from Sunil Abraham who, whilst acknowledging concerns about speech regulation, criticised the website defacement as counterproductive given ongoing parliamentary and judicial efforts to reform the controversial provision.

Contents

  1. Article Details
  2. Full Text
  3. Context and Background
  4. External Link

Article Details

📰 Published in:
The Times of India
✍️ Author:
Kim Arora
📅 Date:
13 December 2012
📄 Type:
News Report
📰 Newspaper Link:
Read Online

Full Text

NEW DELHI: The Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL) website, www.bsnl.co.in, was hacked and defaced on Thursday afternoon. A message on the home page said the attack was carried out by the hacktivist group, Anonymous India, as a protest against section 66 A of the IT Act and in support of cartoonist Aseem Trivedi, on an indefinite hunger strike at Jantar Mantar since Dec 8 for the same.

The website was restored around 7 pm.

Trivedi said he had received a call from Anonymous around 1.30 in the afternoon informing him that the website has been defaced. On being asked if such a form of protest was valid, Trivedi said, "When the government doesn't pay heed to people's protests against its laws and arrests innocent people for Facebook posts, then such a protest is absolutely valid."

For most of the afternoon and early evening, the BSNL website wasn't available directly. A cached version of the BSNL home page showed an image of cartoonist Trivedi with text that read "Hacked by Anonymous India. support Aseem trivedi (cartoonist) and alok dixit on the hunger strike. remove IT Act 66a databases of all 250 bsnl site has been d Hacked by Anonymous India (sic)". While this message was repeated over and over on the page, it ended with the line "Proof are (sic) here" followed by a link to a page containing the passwords to BSNL databases. BSNL officials were unaware of the attack until Thursday evening.

Late in the evening, Anonymous India tweeted from their account @opindia_revenge: "BSNL Websites hacked, passwords and database leaked... Anonymous India demands withdrawal of Sec 66A of IT Act."

In an open letter to the Government of India posted on alternate media website Kafila in June this year, Anonymous had explained they only carried out Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks on Indian government websites, which is different from the act of hacking per se.

Contrary views too exist. Sunil Abraham, executive director, Centre for Internet and Society, says the attack was unwarranted. "Speech regulation in India is not a lost cause, the Minister is holding consultations, MPs are raising the issue in Parliament, courts have been approached and there is massive public outcry on social media. Therefore I would request Anonymous India to desist from defacing websites," said Abraham. A group of MPs, including Baijayant Jay Panda from Odisha, are scheduled to present a motion in Parliament on Friday morning for the amendment of section 66A of the IT Act.

Last month, two young girls were arrested in Palghar, Maharashtra, for criticizing on Facebook the bandh that followed the death of Shiv Sena supremo Balasaheb Thackeray. Before that, Karti Chidambaram, son of finance minister P Chidambaram, took a man to court for commenting on his financial assets on Twitter. In both cases, the complainant 'used' section 66 A of the IT Act. The section and the Act have since come in for wide debate regarding freedom of speech.

Back to Top ⇧

Context and Background

This incident took place amid escalating opposition to Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, a provision widely criticised for its vague wording and misuse against online speech. By late 2012, arrests linked to social media posts had generated public anger, with activists, lawyers and MPs questioning the section’s compatibility with free expression.

The defacement of the BSNL website on 13 December 2012 formed part of this broader protest climate. Anonymous India framed the attack as solidarity with cartoonist Aseem Trivedi and activist Alok Dixit, who were on hunger strike at Jantar Mantar demanding the repeal of Section 66A. The action drew attention both to the law and to security weaknesses in government-owned digital infrastructure.

At the same time, the article reflects internal disagreement within the free speech movement about protest tactics. While Trivedi defended the defacement as a response to state inaction, Sunil Abraham argued that institutional avenues for reform remained active. Parliamentary motions were being prepared, courts had been approached, and ministerial consultations were underway. In this context, Abraham cautioned that website defacement risked undermining legitimate advocacy by conflating protest with cyber intrusion.

The episode illustrates the tension between disruptive digital activism and procedural reform efforts during this period. It captures an early stage of the struggle against Section 66A, when public frustration with enforcement practices coexisted with ongoing attempts to resolve the issue through democratic and legal channels.

📄 This page was created on 25 December 2025. You can view its history on GitHub, preview the fileTip: Press Alt+Shift+G, or inspect the .